Shroud of turin carbon dating flaws Recorded sexy chat room
I am a relief (aka substitute, supply) high school teacher and today I had several Society and Environment (i.e. One of the lessons in one of those S&E classes that I taught today was about how archaeologists date the past.[Left (click to enlarge): Easton, M., et al., "SOSE Alive 1: Studies of Society and Environment," John Wiley and Sons: Milton QLD, Australia, 2003, p.15] There was nothing surprising about that.No one has been able to determine exactly how the markings got there, but they appear in bas-relief in a perfect negative image.Testing has proved that there is no way that the image is forged.Firm believers in the authenticity of the Shroud were confident of a serious dating error (or incredible oversight in the c-14 dating process).
Adding to that a third member of their team has identified a part of the Shroud's markings as that of blood from a human male.
The shroud allegedly was in a fire during the early part of the 16th century and, according to believers in the shroud's authenticity, that is what accounts for the carbon dating of the shroud as being no more than 650 years old.
To non-believers, this sounds like an ad hoc hypothesis. The suggestions that modern biological contaminants were sufficient to modernize the date are also ridiculous.
You can find a more detailed report about their research on the .
The third was a multi-parametric mechanical test based on five different mechanical parameters linked to the voltage of the wire.